GreatSchools: Involved Parents. Successful Kids
Image of globe and book on table

Coventry School District

GreatSchools Rating: 6 out of 10. GreatSchools Ratings are based on test results. 10 is best.
This district's rating is based on its schools' test results; 10 is best. Learn more >

Learn About This District's:

1700 Main Street
Coventry, CT 06238
Tolland County
Map >

PH: (860) 742-7317

  • Grades K-12
  • 2072 students
  • 4 schools

View all schools in this district >

Compare schools in this district:


 CMT Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 81% (2008)
 76% (2007)
 70% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2008.

Writing
 92% (2008)
 85% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 90% (2008)
 85% (2007)
 79% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

Reading
 78% (2008)
 73% (2007)
 83% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2008.

Writing
 92% (2008)
 86% (2007)
 86% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2008.

Math
 88% (2008)
 84% (2007)
 84% (2006)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Reading
 77% (2008)
 80% (2007)
 81% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2008.

Science
 92% (2008)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 86% (2008)
 89% (2007)
 87% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2008.

Math
 88% (2008)
 87% (2007)
 87% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

Reading
 86% (2008)
 78% (2007)
 75% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2008.

Writing
 84% (2008)
 86% (2007)
 81% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 85% (2008)
 81% (2007)
 78% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 7

Reading
 86% (2008)
 78% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 80% in 2008.

Writing
 81% (2008)
 84% (2007)
 84% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 80% in 2008.

Math
 90% (2008)
 81% (2007)
 79% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 8

Reading
 74% (2008)
 77% (2007)
 78% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 77% in 2008.

Science
 80% (2008)
The state average for Science was 75% in 2008.

Writing
 82% (2008)
 87% (2007)
 83% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 79% (2008)
 76% (2007)
 74% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare all elementary and middle schools in this district

Back to top >
 CMT Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis District
All Students81%
Female85%
Male76%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White81%
Not economically disadvantaged82%
Students without disabilities88%
Not English language learners81%

WritingThis District
All Students92%
Female92%
Male93%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White92%
Not economically disadvantaged92%
Students without disabilities96%
Not English language learners92%

MathThis District
All Students90%
Female88%
Male91%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White90%
Not economically disadvantaged92%
Students without disabilities94%
Not English language learners90%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
ReadingThis District
All Students78%
Female85%
Male73%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White78%
Not economically disadvantaged80%
Students without disabilities85%
Not English language learners78%

WritingThis District
All Students92%
Female99%
Male86%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White92%
Not economically disadvantaged94%
Students without disabilities95%
Not English language learners92%

MathThis District
All Students88%
Female88%
Male89%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White89%
Not economically disadvantaged91%
Students without disabilities92%
Not English language learners88%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ReadingThis District
All Students77%
Female78%
Male75%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White80%
Not economically disadvantaged76%
Students with disabilities29%
Students without disabilities84%
Not English language learners77%

ScienceThis District
All Students92%
Female93%
Male91%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White93%
Not economically disadvantaged92%
Students with disabilities71%
Students without disabilities95%
Not English language learners92%

WritingThis District
All Students86%
Female93%
Male79%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White89%
Not economically disadvantaged86%
Students with disabilities43%
Students without disabilities93%
Not English language learners86%

MathThis District
All Students88%
Female88%
Male88%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White90%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students with disabilities52%
Students without disabilities93%
Not English language learners88%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
ReadingThis District
All Students86%
Female86%
Male85%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White85%
Not economically disadvantaged86%
Students without disabilities91%
Not English language learners86%

WritingThis District
All Students84%
Female93%
Male76%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White85%
Not economically disadvantaged87%
Students without disabilities89%
Not English language learners84%

MathThis District
All Students85%
Female84%
Male86%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White85%
Not economically disadvantaged86%
Students without disabilities90%
Not English language learners85%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 7
ReadingThis District
All Students86%
Female93%
Male78%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White87%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students without disabilities90%
Not English language learners86%

WritingThis District
All Students81%
Female92%
Male70%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Not economically disadvantaged82%
Students without disabilities87%
Not English language learners81%

MathThis District
All Students90%
Female91%
Male88%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White91%
Not economically disadvantaged91%
Students without disabilities95%
Not English language learners90%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 8
ReadingThis District
All Students74%
Female80%
Male69%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White76%
Not economically disadvantaged77%
Students with disabilities14%
Students without disabilities82%
Not English language learners74%

ScienceThis District
All Students80%
Female80%
Male80%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White82%
Not economically disadvantaged82%
Students with disabilities29%
Students without disabilities87%
Not English language learners80%

WritingThis District
All Students82%
Female89%
Male76%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White83%
Not economically disadvantaged84%
Students with disabilities14%
Students without disabilities91%
Not English language learners82%

MathThis District
All Students79%
Female75%
Male83%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White80%
Not economically disadvantaged81%
Students with disabilities19%
Students without disabilities87%
Not English language learners79%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

Back to top >
 CAPT Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 10

Reading
 89% (2008)
 90% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 83% in 2008.

Science
 89% (2008)
 95% (2007)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 93% (2008)
 91% (2007)
The state average for Writing was 88% in 2008.

Math
 90% (2008)
 90% (2007)
The state average for Math was 80% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT) to test students' skills in reading, writing, science and math in grade 10.
  • The CAPT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare all high schools in this district

Back to top >
 CAPT Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 10
ReadingThis District
All Students89%
Female93%
Male86%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White89%
Not economically disadvantaged90%
Students without disabilities96%
Not English language learners89%

ScienceThis District
All Students89%
Female89%
Male89%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White89%
Not economically disadvantaged89%
Students without disabilities97%
Not English language learners89%

WritingThis District
All Students93%
Female98%
Male89%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White93%
Not economically disadvantaged93%
Students with disabilities60%
Students without disabilities99%
Not English language learners93%

MathThis District
All Students90%
Female89%
Male90%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White90%
Not economically disadvantaged92%
Students without disabilities97%
Not English language learners90%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT) to test students' skills in reading, writing, science and math in grade 10.
  • The CAPT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

Back to top >
 Teachers

 
Student-Teacher Ratio
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2005-2006
 This DistrictState Average
Students per FTE teacher1515

Back to top >
 Students

 
Student Ethnicity
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2005-2006
EthnicityThis DistrictState Average
White, not Hispanic95%67%
Hispanic2%15%
Black, not Hispanic1%14%
American Indian/Alaskan Native<1%<1%
Asian/Pacific Islander<1%4%
Student Economic Level
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2005-2006
 This DistrictState Average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program9%27%

Back to top >
 Spending Per Pupil

 
Spending Per Pupil
Information about this data
 This DistrictState Average
Total per pupil expenditures$11,049$12,716
Breakdown By Expenditure  
Instructional61%63%
Student and staff support11%8%
Administration8%10%
Other expenditures20%19%
Source: NCES, 2005-2006

Back to top >